We need to kill the death penalty, not people. Here are 10 reasons why, any one of which could be enough. 1) Democracy. The death penalty is. The death penalty is reserved for the most heinous of crimes, such as murder. Why should a murderer be allowed to live out the rest of their lives in relative. America should no longer accept the myth that capital punishment plays procedures that would protect against those constitutional problems.


Author: Olin Grady
Country: Algeria
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 28 October 2017
Pages: 411
PDF File Size: 43.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.80 Mb
ISBN: 448-2-16308-970-4
Downloads: 57687
Price: Free
Uploader: Olin Grady


The death penalty is brutal on society. The brutalization effect suggests that when violence is condoned via the death penalty, more violence occurs. Homicide rates tend to increase around the time of executions, due to legitimation, desensitization, and imitation.

The death penalty arguments against death penalty society more dangerous by further increasing violence through the brutalization effect.

Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments - Death Penalty -

The death penalty is uncivilized. Civilized countries have banned the death penalty as have 18 U.

Innocent people are on death row and innocent people have been put to death. These are irreversible tragedies.

Sinceprisoners on death row have been found to be innocent of the crimes for which they were arguments against death penalty. The Death Penalty Information Centre strongly suspects that ten prisoners who were put to death were wrongly accused and killed.

The death penalty is racist and has been applied in racially-discriminatory ways.

Arguments against capital punishment

African American men arguments against death penalty disproportionately sentenced to death. Prosecutors, juries, and judges are much more likely to apply the death penalty when the victim is white and the defendant is black.

The death penalty is inhumane. Killing people makes us like the murderers who most of us so despise.

It is arguments against death penalty only about what capital punishment does to those killed, but also what it does to those who do the killing and those in whose name the killing is done.

The tide is turning against the death penalty.

Increasingly, countries and states are banning the death penalty; drug companies are refusing to arguments against death penalty their products to be used for capital punishment; the U.

Decreased crime rates, changes in sentencing guidelines, diminishing support, and demographics the young and people of color are much less likely to support the death penalty are all leading toward less capital punishment and its ultimate abolition.

There are also personal, political, religious, and spiritual reasons to oppose capital punishment.


This is the world we live in. The death penalty is a harsh punishment, arguments against death penalty it is not harsh on crime. It's actually impossible to test the deterrent effect of a punishment in a rigorous way, as to do so would require knowing how many murders would have been committed in a particular state if the law had been different during the same time period.


Deterrence is a morally flawed concept Even if capital punishment did act as a deterrent, is it acceptable for someone to pay arguments against death penalty the predicted future crimes of others? Some people argue that one may as well punish innocent people; it will have the same effect. This isn't true - if people are randomly picked up off the street and punished as scapegoats the only consequence is likely to be that the public will be frightened to go out.

Other Relevant Articles: